Benchmarking Sets: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m (→Enrichment) |
mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
* [http://www.biopharmics.com/downloads.html Jain] | * [http://www.biopharmics.com/downloads.html Jain] | ||
== | == Activity Data == | ||
* Hert & Willett | * [http://www.cheminformatics.org/datasets/hert/index.shtml Hert & Willett] | ||
* [http://bindingdb.org Gilson's binding DB] | |||
== Aggregator Data == | |||
== | |||
== Other seful sources of information == | |||
* MDDR | * MDDR | ||
* MOAD | * MOAD | ||
Revision as of 00:52, 28 November 2006
Benchmarking sets are important for testing virtual screening algorithms. There are several kinds of benchmarking sets for several separate kinds of tests. Pose Prediction test sets are drawn from crystal structures in the PDB. Here the goal is to have the docking program reproduce the crystal structure. Enrichment test sets test the ability of a virtual screening program to enrich known actives relative to assumed (or known) decoys. Pattern Matching test sets are used for testing substructure based methods of enrichment.
This is a stub - incomplete.
Pose Prediction
Enrichment
Activity Data
Aggregator Data
Other seful sources of information
- MDDR
- MOAD