Reactivity axis

Here we describe the reactivity axis in the ZINC15, particularly in the exported subsets available via the tranche browser.

In the discussion below, ZINC12 standard subsets included: A, B, C, D, E.

The ZINC12 subsets known as "clean" subsets were just A, B, C, D.

The Reactivity Axis

Class	Nickname	Description	How computed	Examples	internal score
A	Anodyne aka no-PAINS	No flags of any kind set	pattern_origin_fk is null	example	0
B	Reserved1	Future Use	no matches	example	5
C	ZINC clean aka PAINS-ok	Worst problem is a match with a PAINS with not clear mechanism	pattern_origin_fk =2	example	10
D	Reserved2	Future Use	no matches	example	20
E	mildly reactive	mildly electrophilic or nucleophilic group, including PAINS where these mechanisms have been assigned.	pattern_type_fk in (1,2)	aldhydes, thiols, michael acceptors, epoxides	30
F	Reserved3	Future Use	no matches	example	40
G	reactive	electrophile or nucleophile, including PAINS where these mechanisms have been assigned	pattern_type in (3,4)	alpha halo ketones, alkyl halides. Note includes cancer drugs.	50
H	Reserved4	Future use	no matches	example	60
I	Unstable	Highly reactive	pattern_origin=7	typically reagents, but could be used for covalent binding. e.g. boronic acids	70

other concepts mentioned, must be fit in: chelation, redox, covalent, amphiphilicity

poor derivatizability, optimizability

we never build protomers of H, G, F.

we need to classify pains by assumed mechanism