Reactivity axis
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Here we describe the reactivity axis in the ZINC15, particularly in the exported subsets available via the tranche browser.
In the discussion below, ZINC12 standard subsets included: A, B, C, D, E.
The ZINC12 subsets known as "clean" subsets were just A, B, C, D.
The Reactivity Axis
Class | Nickname | Description | How computed | Examples | internal score |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
A | Anodyne | No flags of any kind set | pattern_origin_fk is null | example | 0 |
B | Reserved1 | Future Use | no matches | example | 5 |
C | PAINS ok | Worst problem is a match with a PAINS with not clear mechanism | pattern_origin_fk =2 | example | 10 |
D | Reserved2 | Future Use | no matches | example | 20 |
E | mildly reactive | mildly electrophilic or nucleophilic group, including PAINS where these mechanisms have been assigned. | pattern_type_fk in (1,2) | aldhydes, thiols, michael acceptors, epoxides | 30 |
F | Reserved3 | Future Use | no matches | example | 40 |
G | reactive | electrophile or nucleophile, including PAINS where these mechanisms have been assigned | pattern_type in (3,4) | alpha halo ketones, alkyl halides. Note includes cancer drugs. | 50 |
H | Reserved4 | Future use | no matches | example | 60 |
I | Unstable | Highly reactive | pattern_origin=7 | typically reagents, but could be used for covalent binding. e.g. boronic acids | 70 |
other concepts mentioned, must be fit in: chelation, redox, covalent, amphiphilicity
poor derivatizability, optimizability
we never build protomers of H, G, F.
we need to classify pains by assumed mechanism
397 pains never hit any compound in zinc