Reactivity axis: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(asdf) |
(→The Clean Axis: asdf) |
||
Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
| C || Chromophore || Worst problem is a chromophore that could interfere with some asays || extended conjugated system, pattern_type = 5 | | C || Chromophore || Worst problem is a chromophore that could interfere with some asays || extended conjugated system, pattern_type = 5 | ||
|- | |- | ||
| D || Any PAINS || Any pains pattern not covered in E,F,G,H || pattern_type= 8 (PAINS) | | D || Any PAINS || Any pains pattern not covered in E,F,G,H || pattern_type= 8 (call it mild PAINS, or pains we don't necessarly believe in because there is no clear MOA) | ||
|- | |- | ||
| E || mildly electrophilic or nucleophilic || aldhydes, thiols, michael acceptors, epoxides || pattern_type in (1,2) | | E || mildly electrophilic or nucleophilic || aldhydes, thiols, michael acceptors, epoxides || pattern_type in (1,2) | ||
Line 24: | Line 24: | ||
| G || unstable in buffer || typically reagents, but could be used for covalent binding. e.g. boronic acids || pattern_type = 10 | | G || unstable in buffer || typically reagents, but could be used for covalent binding. e.g. boronic acids || pattern_type = 10 | ||
|- | |- | ||
| H || nonsensical || idea from the PAINS papers || pattern_type = 14 | | H || nonsensical || idea from the PAINS papers || pattern_type = 14. This is a container, but generally we are not expecting to find any of these in ZINC. | ||
|} | |} | ||
Revision as of 19:52, 21 July 2015
Here we describe the "clean" axis in the exported subsets of ZINC15.
Traditionally, ZINC standard subsets included: A, B, C, D, E.
ZINC "clean" subsets were just A, B, C, D.
The Clean Axis
Class | Nickname | Description | How computed |
---|---|---|---|
A | Anodyne | No flags of any kind set | no pattern matches whatsoever |
B | Unnecessarily complex | The worst feature is the molecules are over decorated e.g. too many chlorides | complex, requires representative in A. This is really reserved for future use, and gives us the opportunity to split "super clean" into A (representatives) and B (versions of A) |
C | Chromophore | Worst problem is a chromophore that could interfere with some asays | extended conjugated system, pattern_type = 5 |
D | Any PAINS | Any pains pattern not covered in E,F,G,H | pattern_type= 8 (call it mild PAINS, or pains we don't necessarly believe in because there is no clear MOA) |
E | mildly electrophilic or nucleophilic | aldhydes, thiols, michael acceptors, epoxides | pattern_type in (1,2) |
F | strongly electrophilic or nucleophilic | alpha halo ketones, alkyl halides. Note includes cancer drugs. | pattern_type in (3,4) |
G | unstable in buffer | typically reagents, but could be used for covalent binding. e.g. boronic acids | pattern_type = 10 |
H | nonsensical | idea from the PAINS papers | pattern_type = 14. This is a container, but generally we are not expecting to find any of these in ZINC. |
other concepts mentioned, must be fit in: chelation, redox, covalent, amphiphilicity
poor derivatizability, optimizability
we never build protomers of H, G, F.
we need to classify pains by assumed mechanism
397 pains never hit any compound in zinc