ZINC:Errata - Revision history

Frodo: asd

2017-02-22T05:35:04Z

asd

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:35, 22 February 2017
Line 34:		Line 34:
	We believe there are several cases of this in DUD (and ZINC). E/Z isomerism has been a sore point for us ever since we got started. We are aware of this problem, and aim to fix as many of these problems as possible in the next release. I think the SDF should be taken as authoritative over the SMILES, if they disagree. However, we have not yet been able to make a complete study of this.		We believe there are several cases of this in DUD (and ZINC). E/Z isomerism has been a sore point for us ever since we got started. We are aware of this problem, and aim to fix as many of these problems as possible in the next release. I think the SDF should be taken as authoritative over the SMILES, if they disagree. However, we have not yet been able to make a complete study of this.

			= coding =
			/nfs/soft/www/apps/zinc15/run/n-1-110/zinc15-backend-8115/zinc15-backend-8115.cfg was wrong

	[[Category:Errata]]		[[Category:Errata]]
	[[Category:ZINC]]		[[Category:ZINC]]

Therese: 6 revisions

2012-10-08T20:33:17Z

6 revisions

← Older revision

Revision as of 20:33, 8 October 2012

JohnIrwin at 21:50, 19 December 2007

2007-12-19T21:50:20Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:50, 19 December 2007
Line 3:		Line 3:

	* for SIGMA propiophenone [http://www.sigmaaldrich.com/catalog/search/ProductDetail/ALDRICH/P51605 P51605] ZINC has 1671385 entry, and the ring in it does not show as aromatic.		* for SIGMA propiophenone [http://www.sigmaaldrich.com/catalog/search/ProductDetail/ALDRICH/P51605 P51605] ZINC has 1671385 entry, and the ring in it does not show as aromatic.
			** FIXED on 12/18/07

	* many molecules reported with ZINC01278699. Sorry about this case. It will be removed in the next version.		* many molecules reported with ZINC01278699. Sorry about this case. It will be removed in the next version.

JohnIrwin at 00:53, 7 December 2007

2007-12-07T00:53:22Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:53, 7 December 2007
Line 24:		Line 24:

	I agree that there are a little over 2,500 differences in the mol2 and SMILES of Sigma Aldrich in ZINC version 7, a little over 2% of the library.		I agree that there are a little over 2,500 differences in the mol2 and SMILES of Sigma Aldrich in ZINC version 7, a little over 2% of the library.



			* There appears to be an issue with isomerism in the ZINC database, which affects DUD. An example is compounds 3165371 and 4460991. These are E/Z isomers around a double bond. If you ask for the SMILES strings, these match the 2D depictions you see on the search results page (not suprising, really, as I imagine that the 2D depictions are generated directly from the SMILES). However, if you ask for these compounds as SDF files, you get the correct isomer of 4460991, but you get two structures for 3165371, both of which are wrong compared to the SMILES (one is identical to 4460991, and the other has the exocyclic double bond flipped).

			Both of these compounds are in the DUD data set. However, since the SDF data available for 3165371 are incorrect, the DUD data set has ended up with duplicate structures.

			We believe there are several cases of this in DUD (and ZINC). E/Z isomerism has been a sore point for us ever since we got started. We are aware of this problem, and aim to fix as many of these problems as possible in the next release. I think the SDF should be taken as authoritative over the SMILES, if they disagree. However, we have not yet been able to make a complete study of this.


	[[Category:Errata]]		[[Category:Errata]]
	[[Category:ZINC]]		[[Category:ZINC]]

JohnIrwin at 00:41, 7 December 2007

2007-12-07T00:41:01Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:41, 7 December 2007
Line 6:		Line 6:
	* many molecules reported with ZINC01278699. Sorry about this case. It will be removed in the next version.		* many molecules reported with ZINC01278699. Sorry about this case. It will be removed in the next version.

			* the following pairs are not identical, but actually different protonation states of hydroxamic acids (looks like PipelinePilot has a problem interpreting the mol2 files, I rechecked everything with the sdf files): ZINC03817650, ZINC04628541; ZINC01548784, ZINC03820719

	* I downloaded the databases Asinex and Sigma-aldrich from the version 7		* I downloaded the databases Asinex and Sigma-aldrich from the version 7

JohnIrwin at 22:35, 6 December 2007

2007-12-06T22:35:29Z

@@ Line 5: / Line 5: @@
 * many molecules reported with    ZINC01278699. Sorry about this case. It will be removed in the next version.
 [[Category:Errata]]
 [[Category:ZINC]]

JohnIrwin at 20:25, 6 December 2007

2007-12-06T20:25:15Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:25, 6 December 2007
Line 4:		Line 4:
	* for SIGMA propiophenone [http://www.sigmaaldrich.com/catalog/search/ProductDetail/ALDRICH/P51605 P51605] ZINC has 1671385 entry, and the ring in it does not show as aromatic.		* for SIGMA propiophenone [http://www.sigmaaldrich.com/catalog/search/ProductDetail/ALDRICH/P51605 P51605] ZINC has 1671385 entry, and the ring in it does not show as aromatic.

			* many molecules reported with ZINC01278699. Sorry about this case. It will be removed in the next version.

	[[Category:Errata]]		[[Category:Errata]]
	[[Category:ZINC]]		[[Category:ZINC]]

JohnIrwin at 20:12, 6 December 2007

2007-12-06T20:12:05Z

New page

Here are errata as reported for ZINC:

* for SIGMA propiophenone [http://www.sigmaaldrich.com/catalog/search/ProductDetail/ALDRICH/P51605 P51605] ZINC has 1671385 entry, and the ring in it does not show as aromatic.

[[Category:Errata]]
[[Category:ZINC]]