Sphere Matching - Revision history

Frodo at 04:25, 14 February 2014

2014-02-14T04:25:59Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:25, 14 February 2014
Line 12:		Line 12:

	Multiple orientations may be written out for each molecule using the write_orientations parameter (see Ligand File Input/Output), otherwise only the best orientation is recorded.		Multiple orientations may be written out for each molecule using the write_orientations parameter (see Ligand File Input/Output), otherwise only the best orientation is recorded.

			[[Category:Docking]]
			[[Category:Theory]]

Therese: 3 revisions

2012-10-08T20:32:24Z

3 revisions

← Older revision

Revision as of 20:32, 8 October 2012

Rgc: fixing formatting

2010-03-15T22:01:15Z

fixing formatting

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:01, 15 March 2010
Line 8:		Line 8:

	(1) Automated Matching —Specify the number of orientations, and dock will generate matches until enough orientations passing the bump filter have been formed. Matches are formed best first, with respect to the difference in the ligand and site point internal distances.		(1) Automated Matching —Specify the number of orientations, and dock will generate matches until enough orientations passing the bump filter have been formed. Matches are formed best first, with respect to the difference in the ligand and site point internal distances.

	(2) Manual Matching —Specify the distance and node parameters, and DOCK will generate all the matches which satisfy them. The number of orientations scored is equal to the total matches minus the orientations discarded by the user applied filters.		(2) Manual Matching —Specify the distance and node parameters, and DOCK will generate all the matches which satisfy them. The number of orientations scored is equal to the total matches minus the orientations discarded by the user applied filters.

	Multiple orientations may be written out for each molecule using the write_orientations parameter (see Ligand File Input/Output), otherwise only the best orientation is recorded.		Multiple orientations may be written out for each molecule using the write_orientations parameter (see Ligand File Input/Output), otherwise only the best orientation is recorded.

Rgc: fixing formatting

2010-03-15T22:01:03Z

fixing formatting

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:01, 15 March 2010
Line 1:		Line 1:
	2.6.1. Sphere Matching		2.6.1. Sphere Matching

	The rigid body orienting code is written as a direct implementation of the isomorphous subgraph matching method of Crippen and Kuhl (Kuhl, et al. J. Comput. Chem. 1984). All receptor sphere pairs and atom center pairs are considered for inclusion in a matching clique. This is more computationally demanding than the clique matching algorithm implemented in previous versions of that used a distance binning algorithm to restrict the clique search, in which pairs of spheres and atom centers were binned by distance. Only sphere pairs and center pairs that were within the same distance bin were considered as potential matches (Ewing, et al. J. Comput. Chem. 1997) .		The rigid body orienting code is written as a direct implementation of the isomorphous subgraph matching method of Crippen and Kuhl (Kuhl, et al. J. Comput. Chem. 1984). All receptor sphere pairs and atom center pairs are considered for inclusion in a matching clique. This is more computationally demanding than the clique matching algorithm implemented in previous versions of that used a distance binning algorithm to restrict the clique search, in which pairs of spheres and atom centers were binned by distance. Only sphere pairs and center pairs that were within the same distance bin were considered as potential matches (Ewing, et al. J. Comput. Chem. 1997) .

	The clique matching implementation avoids bin boundaries that prevent some receptor sphere and ligand atom pairs from matching, and, as a result, it can find good matches missed by previous versions of dock. The rigid body rotation code has also been corrected to avoid a singularity that occurred if the spheres in the match lay within the same plane.		The clique matching implementation avoids bin boundaries that prevent some receptor sphere and ligand atom pairs from matching, and, as a result, it can find good matches missed by previous versions of dock. The rigid body rotation code has also been corrected to avoid a singularity that occurred if the spheres in the match lay within the same plane.

	There are two types of ligand orientation currently available:		There are two types of ligand orientation currently available:

	(1) Automated Matching —Specify the number of orientations, and dock will generate matches until enough orientations passing the bump filter have been formed. Matches are formed best first, with respect to the difference in the ligand and site point internal distances.		(1) Automated Matching —Specify the number of orientations, and dock will generate matches until enough orientations passing the bump filter have been formed. Matches are formed best first, with respect to the difference in the ligand and site point internal distances.
	(2) Manual Matching —Specify the distance and node parameters, and DOCK will generate all the matches which satisfy them. The number of orientations scored is equal to the total matches minus the orientations discarded by the user applied filters.		(2) Manual Matching —Specify the distance and node parameters, and DOCK will generate all the matches which satisfy them. The number of orientations scored is equal to the total matches minus the orientations discarded by the user applied filters.

	Multiple orientations may be written out for each molecule using the write_orientations parameter (see Ligand File Input/Output), otherwise only the best orientation is recorded.		Multiple orientations may be written out for each molecule using the write_orientations parameter (see Ligand File Input/Output), otherwise only the best orientation is recorded.

JohnIrwin at 22:33, 19 September 2006

2006-09-19T22:33:42Z

New page

2.6.1. Sphere Matching

The rigid body orienting code is written as a direct implementation of the isomorphous subgraph matching method of Crippen and Kuhl (Kuhl, et al. J. Comput. Chem. 1984). All receptor sphere pairs and atom center pairs are considered for inclusion in a matching clique. This is more computationally demanding than the clique matching algorithm implemented in previous versions of that used a distance binning algorithm to restrict the clique search, in which pairs of spheres and atom centers were binned by distance. Only sphere pairs and center pairs that were within the same distance bin were considered as potential matches (Ewing, et al. J. Comput. Chem. 1997) .

The clique matching implementation avoids bin boundaries that prevent some receptor sphere and ligand atom pairs from matching, and, as a result, it can find good matches missed by previous versions of dock. The rigid body rotation code has also been corrected to avoid a singularity that occurred if the spheres in the match lay within the same plane.

There are two types of ligand orientation currently available:

(1) Automated Matching —Specify the number of orientations, and dock will generate matches until enough orientations passing the bump filter have been formed. Matches are formed best first, with respect to the difference in the ligand and site point internal distances.
(2) Manual Matching —Specify the distance and node parameters, and DOCK will generate all the matches which satisfy them. The number of orientations scored is equal to the total matches minus the orientations discarded by the user applied filters.

Multiple orientations may be written out for each molecule using the write_orientations parameter (see Ligand File Input/Output), otherwise only the best orientation is recorded.