Reactivity axis: Difference between revisions

From DISI
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(asdf)
Line 8: Line 8:
{| class="wikitable"
{| class="wikitable"
|-
|-
! Class !! Nickname !! Description || How computed || Examples
! Class !! Nickname !! Description || How computed || Examples || score
|-
|-
| A ||  Anodyne ||  No flags of any kind set || pattern_origin_fk is null || example
| A ||  Anodyne ||  No flags of any kind set || pattern_origin_fk is null || example || 0
|-
|-
| B || Reserved1  || Future Use || no matches || example
| B || Reserved1  || Future Use || no matches || example || 5
|-
|-
| C || PAINS sans mechanism || Worst problem is, PAINS without a clear mechanism matches || pattern_origin_fk =2 || example
| C || PAINS sans mechanism || Worst problem is, PAINS without a clear mechanism matches || pattern_origin_fk =2 || example || 10
|-
|-
| D || Reserved2 || Future Use || no matches || example
| D || Reserved2 || Future Use || no matches || example || 20
|-
|-
| E || mildly reactive || mildly electrophilic or nucleophilic group, including PAINS where these mechanisms have been assigned.  ||  pattern_type_fk in (1,2) || aldhydes, thiols, michael acceptors, epoxides
| E || mildly reactive || mildly electrophilic or nucleophilic group, including PAINS where these mechanisms have been assigned.  ||  pattern_type_fk in (1,2) || aldhydes, thiols, michael acceptors, epoxides || 30
|-
|-
| F || Reserved3 || Future Use || no matches || example
| F || Reserved3 || Future Use || no matches || example || 40
|-
|-
| G || reactive || electrophile or nucleophile, including PAINS where these mechanisms have been assigned || pattern_type in (3,4) || alpha halo ketones, alkyl halides.  Note includes cancer drugs.
| G || reactive || electrophile or nucleophile, including PAINS where these mechanisms have been assigned || pattern_type in (3,4) || alpha halo ketones, alkyl halides.  Note includes cancer drugs. || 50
|-
|-
| H || Reserved4 || Future use || no matches || example
| H || Reserved4 || Future use || no matches || example || 60
|-
|-
| I || Unstable || Highly reactive || pattern_origin=7 || typically reagents, but could be used for covalent binding. e.g. boronic acids
| I || Unstable || Highly reactive || pattern_origin=7 || typically reagents, but could be used for covalent binding. e.g. boronic acids || 70
|}
|}



Revision as of 04:17, 13 August 2015

Here we describe the "clean" axis in the exported subsets of ZINC15.

Traditionally, ZINC standard subsets included: A, B, C, D, E.

ZINC "clean" subsets were just A, B, C, D.

The Clean Axis

Class Nickname Description How computed Examples score
A Anodyne No flags of any kind set pattern_origin_fk is null example 0
B Reserved1 Future Use no matches example 5
C PAINS sans mechanism Worst problem is, PAINS without a clear mechanism matches pattern_origin_fk =2 example 10
D Reserved2 Future Use no matches example 20
E mildly reactive mildly electrophilic or nucleophilic group, including PAINS where these mechanisms have been assigned. pattern_type_fk in (1,2) aldhydes, thiols, michael acceptors, epoxides 30
F Reserved3 Future Use no matches example 40
G reactive electrophile or nucleophile, including PAINS where these mechanisms have been assigned pattern_type in (3,4) alpha halo ketones, alkyl halides. Note includes cancer drugs. 50
H Reserved4 Future use no matches example 60
I Unstable Highly reactive pattern_origin=7 typically reagents, but could be used for covalent binding. e.g. boronic acids 70

other concepts mentioned, must be fit in: chelation, redox, covalent, amphiphilicity

poor derivatizability, optimizability

we never build protomers of H, G, F.

we need to classify pains by assumed mechanism

397 pains never hit any compound in zinc