ChEMBL errata: Difference between revisions

From DISI
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
This is a page to keep track of errata we've found with the ChEMBL database at [https://www.ebi.ac.uk/chembldb/]
This is a page to keep track of errata we've found with the ChEMBL database at [https://www.ebi.ac.uk/chembldb/]


 
* 4.  https://www.ebi.ac.uk/chembldb/index.php/compound/inspect/CHEMBL389012 
* 1.  https://www.ebi.ac.uk/chembldb/index.php/bioactivity/results/1/cmpd_chemblid/asc/tab/display
Annotated as an Antagonist in ChEMBL, but abstract claims it is an agonist
 
6nM in ChEMBL.  6uM in original paper.
 
 
* 2. https://www.ebi.ac.uk/chembldb/index.php/compound/inspect/CHEMBL477452
 
Compound SMILES/drawing are incorrect, as are many compounds from that paper
 
 
* 3.  https://www.ebi.ac.uk/chembldb/doc/inspect/CHEMBL1133572  is erroneously blank.
 
I got to it from this page, trying to get publication data in support of an IC50.
 
https://www.ebi.ac.uk/chembldb/bioactivity/results/1/cmpd_chemblid/asc/tab/display
 
 


[[Category:Errata]]
[[Category:Errata]]

Revision as of 18:39, 9 September 2011

This is a page to keep track of errata we've found with the ChEMBL database at [1]

Annotated as an Antagonist in ChEMBL, but abstract claims it is an agonist