ChEMBL errata: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
mNo edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
6nM in ChEMBL. 6uM in original paper. | 6nM in ChEMBL. 6uM in original paper. | ||
* 2. https://www.ebi.ac.uk/chembldb/index.php/compound/inspect/CHEMBL477452 | * 2. https://www.ebi.ac.uk/chembldb/index.php/compound/inspect/CHEMBL477452 | ||
Compound SMILES/drawing are incorrect, as are many compounds from that paper | Compound SMILES/drawing are incorrect, as are many compounds from that paper | ||
* 3. https://www.ebi.ac.uk/chembldb/doc/inspect/CHEMBL1133572 is erroneously blank. | |||
I got to it from this page, trying to get publication data in support of an IC50. | |||
https://www.ebi.ac.uk/chembldb/bioactivity/results/1/cmpd_chemblid/asc/tab/display | |||
[[Category:Errata]] | [[Category:Errata]] | ||
Revision as of 17:34, 7 September 2011
This is a page to keep track of errata we've found with the ChEMBL database at [1]
6nM in ChEMBL. 6uM in original paper.
Compound SMILES/drawing are incorrect, as are many compounds from that paper
- 3. https://www.ebi.ac.uk/chembldb/doc/inspect/CHEMBL1133572 is erroneously blank.
I got to it from this page, trying to get publication data in support of an IC50.
https://www.ebi.ac.uk/chembldb/bioactivity/results/1/cmpd_chemblid/asc/tab/display